|
(click
here to download submission form)
How
to diagnose Cushing’s disease in the horse.
The recognition of
equine Cushing’s disease (ECD) has evolved over the
last 10-20 years from once being regarded as a rarity to
now being recognised as almost a ‘normal ageing feature’
of horses. We are presented with ever increasing numbers
of suspect ECD cases which the owner requires us to investigate
and diagnose with a view to long-term treatment. There are
however significant problems with diagnostic methods which
lead to considerable confusion over the choice of test and
interpretation of results. The following is intended to
be a summary of current opinion on diagnostic testing for
ECD.
|
Simple
tests
|
Dynamic
tests
|
|
Serum
glucose
|
Dexamethasone
suppression test
|
|
Serum
cortisol
|
TRH
stimulation test
|
|
Serum
insulin
|
ACTH
stimulation test
|
|
Serum
ACTH
|
Combined
ACTH stimulation/dexamethasone suppression
|
|
Urinary
corticoid:creatinine ratio
|
Combined
dexamethasone suppression/TRH stimulation
|
1. Simple tests
There are few causes
of resting hyperglycaemia (normal
3.4-6.5 mmol/l) in the horse other than ECD so, if present,
this finding is fairly specific. However, most horses with
ECD have serum glucose concentrations within the reference
range so this makes the test very insensitive. Other causes
of hyperglycaemia to be aware of include acute stress, a2
agonist sedatives and a cereal-based feed within the past
2-3 hours. Hence the testing of blood glucose should preferably
be done first thing in the morning before feeding and also
the stressful effects of problems such as transportation
or acute laminitis should also be considered. In any case
it would be preferable to reconfirm the presence of resting
hyperglycaemia before placing too much importance on its
presence.
Resting serum cortisol (normal 50-175 nmol/l) is of little
use in suspected ECD cases. Published reports are as likely
to have found high, low or normal resting cortisol in ECD
cases. Some reports have suggested there is loss of the
normal diurnal cortisol rhythm in ECD cases and it has been
suggested that 2 blood samples taken 8 hours apart can be
compared and used to aid diagnosis – the theory being
that in normal horses with a normal diurnal rhythm the cortisol
concentration will differ in the two samples by >30%.
ECD cases may however show similar cortisol levels in both
samples. This is a simple test which requires no stimulation
testing although must be interpreted with caution due to
other extraneous effects on endogenous cortisol production.
Clearly stress, pain (e.g. laminitis) and diet have a big
effect on cortisol secretion and will influence the results.
Results of this test would be more reliable in a pain-free
case not receiving hard feed during for at least 4 hours
before the test period.
Resting serum insulin
(normal 5-36 miu/ml) has become more popular recently and
can be useful but again should be interpreted with great
care. Many horses with Cushing’s disease are indeed
found to have elevated resting insulin concentrations due
to cortisol-induced antagonism of insulin and also the pro-secretory
effect of CLIP (one of the pituitary derived products in
ECD cases). However, diet and stress also have profound
effects on insulin secretion and these should be carefully
considered. A hard feed will elevate insulin levels for
up to 5 hours. We have seen insulin levels as high as 250
miu/ml in non-Cushingoid horses with painful conditions
such as colic and it is likely the pain of laminitis could
have a similar effect. Thus insulin is not a suitable test
for ECD horses with active laminar pain and also is best
measured first thing in the morning before feeding.
Resting serum ACTH
(normal < 7 pmol/l) is a very sensitive and specific
test for ECD but is greatly limited by the stability of
ACTH in blood samples. ACTH is adsorbed by glass so blood
must be taken in plastic tubes. The test must then be performed
immediately or the sample must be kept frozen on its way
to a laboratory.These problems severely limit the practical
use of what might otherwise be a very useful test. Additionally,
not all horses with Cushing's disease have been found to
have increased ACTH.
Urinary corticoid :
creatinine ratio (normal <20 x 10-6) in urine samples
collected first thing in the morning has been used by some.
This is a simple test with reasonable reliability although
results will be affected by the same influences as discussed
above with serum cortisol and also may not be reliable in
dilute samples of urine which are commonly found in ECD
cases (due to polydipsia/polyuria).
2. Dynamic tests
The overnight dexamethasone suppression test is the most
accurate test to have been reported in the literature. The
procedure involves measuring baseline cortisol at about
4-5 pm; injecting 40 mg/kg dexamethasone iv or im (10 ml
of 2mg/ml solution per 500kg); followed by a post stimulation
cortisol at about 11-12 am next day (approx. 19 hours later).
Normal horses show marked suppression of cortisol (<25
nmol/l) in the post stimulation sample whereas ECD cases
show incomplete suppression. In a large study in USA with
post mortem confirmation of ECD this test was highly accurate.
It may be overstating the real situation to say it is completely
accurate but it does seem to be the best available test.
Importantly reports of precipitating or worsening laminitis
following the test are very rare although this potential
problem should be discussed with the owner first.
The TRH stimulation
test is primarily used when concerns over the use of dexamethasone
suppression exist (i.e. laminitis). The procedure involves
measuring baseline cortisol; injecting 1 mg TRH iv (NB.
1 mg TRH costs approx. £100); followed by a post stimulation
sample about 30 minutes later. Normal horses usually show
no real difference between the cortisol concentrations in
both samples whereas ECD cases tend to show elevation of
cortisol in the 2nd sample (at least 20% rise but usually
much greater). The test gives reasonable reliability but
there are significant numbers of false positive and false
negative results.
The ACTH stimulation
test is too unreliable for clinical use. It is reported
that ECD cases show a post stimulation cortisol of >
420 nmol/l and/or > 3 x baseline at 2 hours following
ACTH administration. A positive result could be considered
supportive of the diagnosis of ECD but is not at all definitive
and of questionable value.
Combination tests exist
including combined ACTH stimulation-dexamethasone suppression
test and combined dexamethasone suppression-TRH stimulation
test. None of these tests have been properly validated with
post mortem confirmation of diagnosis in tested horses and
also there are important theoretical concerns in the accuracy
of combination tests which may well simply magnify the inaccuracies
in the individual tests. Therefore it is difficult to justify
the use of such tests.
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
Diarrhoea
in horses and foals:
reducing the ‘no diagnosis’ cases
Although we see many
cases of diarrhoea in equines of all ages, the cause is
often elusive and we have to apply general treatment regimes.
The percentage of horses with diarrhoea in which a firm
ante mortem diagnosis is made has been variably reported
as between 10 and 20%. Although many cases may be undeterminable
and perhaps related to dietary changes etc, there is increasing
recognition that infectious agents and/or their associated
toxins are of major pathogenic importance in equine diarrhoeas
and there are several test procedures now available to improve
our diagnostic rate and help select more targeted therapy
and prevention strategies.
Causes: The ‘usual
suspects’ include Rotavirus and Cryptosporidium in
foals and Salmonella sp. in all age groups. Other pathogens
of potentially major importance both in foals and adult
horses include Aeromonas sp, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium
perfringens.
Diagnosis: Of the bacterial
pathogens Salmonella and Aeromonas sp identification is
relatively straightforward and both can be grown with reasonable
success on routine culture media. Intermittent shedding
of salmonellae may lead to false negative results and repeat
samples are always advisable. Successful culture of C. difficile
and C. perfringens is difficult and not diagnostic per se
as not all strains are toxigenic. Hence the preferred approach
to diagnosis of Clostridial diarrhoeas is ELISA identification
of clostridial toxins - eg. C. perfringens enterotoxin (CPE)
and C. difficile toxins A and B (TOX A/B). Detection of
both Rotavirus and Cryptosporidium in cases of foal diarrhoea
also requires an immunological technique – namely
immunochromatography (ICT). All of these tests (see over)
can be easily performed on a small sample of faeces.
| Pathogen |
Estimated
prevalence (up to)
|
Test*
|
|
Foals
|
Adults
|
| |
|
|
|
| Rotavirus |
40%
|
-
|
ICT
|
| Cryptosporidium |
20%
|
-
|
ICT
|
| C. difficile |
20%
|
20%
|
ELISA
(TOX A/B)
|
| C. perfringens |
20%
|
20%
|
ELISA
(CPE)
|
| Aeromonas sp |
10%
|
50%
|
#
Culture
|
| Salmonella sp. |
5%
|
5%
|
Culture
|
(*
all tests performed on faecal samples; # based on only one
publication)
Treatment: The use
of antibiotics in bacterial diarrhoeas has always been a
contentious issue but is less contentious when a specific
agent has been identified for which a suitable antibiotic
can be targeted. For example, metronidazole is effective
against the vast majority of Clostridial enteropathogens
and enrofloxacin is effective against the vast majority
of Salmonellae and Aeromonads. Codeine phosphate is an old
and reliable means of halting diarrhoea with typically 1-2
mg/kg bid per os being effective in most cases or up to
3 mg/kg tid in the more severe cases (NB. a slow withdrawal
of treatment is vital to success). As an alternative loperamide
(‘Imodium’) can be used at 0.1-0.2 mg/kg bid
per os (2-5 capsules bid per 50kg foal). Adsorbents such
as bismuth subsalicylate (‘Pepto-bismol’) at
1 ml/kg bid per os is a useful adjunct to acute diarrhoea
in horses and foals and some cases benefit from therapy
to counter bowel oedema including corticosteroids and hetastarch.
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
‘Acute
phase proteins’-markers of active inflammation
The ‘inflammatory
profile’ is generally used in the common practice
situation of non-specific lethargy/dullness when infectious
challenge is an important differential diagnosis. The acute
inflammatory reaction results in a widespread and complex
cascade of cytokine and lymphokine production (interleukins,
interferons, eicosanoids etc..) leading to many potentially
detectable changes in the blood. The commonest changes to
be used clinically are neutrophilia and acute phase protein
responses. Acute phase proteins are a wide array of proteins
which are synthesised and released from the liver in response
to inflammatory cytokines (especially interleukin-6). These
proteins include fibrinogen, serum amyloid A, caeruloplasmin,
C-reactive protein, haptoglobin and several others. A large
selection of these acute phase proteins is commonly used
in human clinical pathology although only fibrinogen is
assayed widely in veterinary laboratories. The Liphook Equine
Hospital Laboratory is one of only a few veterinary laboratories
to offer serum amyloid A as an additional acute phase protein
and further proteins are under investigation such as C-reactive
protein and procalcitonin.
Fibrinogen - normally between 1-4 g/l and may rise as high
as 10-15 g/l in severe inflammatory cases. Therefore the
‘pathophysiological range is approximately 4-8X normal.
Values greater than 10 g/l must always be regarded seriously
and carry a guarded (but not necessarily poor) prognosis.
Fibrinogen responds to acute inflammation relatively sluggishly
and may not be outside the reference range for 24-48 hours
following initiation of an acute inflammatory response.
Serum amyloid A - We
have been using SAA at the Liphook Equine Hospital Laboratory
for approximately 2½ years now. We have found the
test both reliable and sensitive to acute inflammation in
horses and it has become our preferred diagnostic and monitoring
acute phase protein in cases such as viral/bacterial respiratory
disease, peritonitis, colitis etc…. Most normal horses
have SAA concentrations around 5 ?g/ml and with severe inflammatory
disorders this can rise to approximately 1000 mcg/ml creating
a pathophysiological range of about 200X normal. Compared
with fibrinogen this allows a far greater ‘grading’
of severity of the inflammatory process and more sensitive
monitoring of progress.
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
Notes
on the investigation of polyuria/polydipsia (PU/PD)
in horses
1. Establish true presence of PU/PD
· Normal water
intake typically 4-6% BWT/day.
PD is water consumption > 10% BWT/day (>50 litres
per 500kg).
· Normal urine production typically 1-3% BWT/day.
PU is urine production > 5% BWT/day (>25 litres per
500kg).
2. Consider differential
diagnoses
First rule out physiological
causes such as lactation, hot weather, heavy work, diarrhoea
(all resulting in PD but not PU) and excessive protein in
diet – commonly alfalfa – leading to PU/PD due
to increased urea excretion.
a. Common causes:
· Psychogenic polydipsia
· Equine Cushing’s Disease – may cause
PU/PD in several ways:
i. Corticosteroid antagonism of insulin leading to secondary
(Type II) Diabetes mellitus (DM)
ii. Reduced secretion of ADH caused by local presence of
pituitary mass causing central Diabetes insipidus (DI).
iii. Diuretic effect of corticosteroids (?ADH antagonism).
b. Uncommon causes
· Chronic renal failure (CRF)– tubular failure
to reabsorb water and electrolytes.
· Diabetes insipidus - central form caused by failure
to secrete ADH.
- renal form caused by failure of nephron to respond to
ADH.
· Primary (Type I) Diabetes mellitus – failure
of pancreatic insulin secretion.
3. Initial laboratory work
a. Haematology
- anaemia common with CRF due to effect of uraemia and reduced
erythropoietin.
b. Serum biochemistry
- azotaemia usually in CRF
- hypercalcaemia often in CRF
- hyperkalaemia sometimes in CRF
- hyperglycaemia sometimes in Equine Cushing’s Disease
c. Urinalysis
i. Specific gravity
(SG). Normal urine specific gravity 1.020-1.060 (typically
1.030-1.040).
- hyposthenuria (<1.008) - often psychogenic polydipsia,
DI
- isosthenuria (1.008-1.014) - often CRF
- hypersthenuria (>1.015) - often DM, Cushings disease
or psychogenic polydipsia (in temporary remission)
ii. Glycosuria –indicates
DM (Type I or Type II - Cushing’s Disease causing
type II DM most likely).
(N.B. acute stress or ?2 agonist sedatives also cause hyperglycaemia
and glycosuria).
iii. Urine creatinine
: serum creatinine ratio Normally > 50. CRF < 40.
iv. Enzymuria –
urinary GGT, AP and LDH may all be raised in CRF (more so
in acute renal failure).
Enzyme levels calculated
as follows after adjustment for urine creatinine concentration:
urinary enzyme (iu/l)
x 1000 < 2.5 (GGT), 3.0 (AP), 1.0 (LDH) iu/mmol
urinary creatinine (mmol/l)
4. Further laboratory work
On the basis of the
above results it should be possible to confirm/rule out
CRF and DM. Cushing’s Disease (if not already suspected
from DM) is usually suggested by typical clinical signs
(old, hairy, laminitic etc..) or ‘overnight’
dexamethasone suppression test.
a. Water deprivation
test
A water deprivation test will be required to differentiate
psychogenic polydipsia from DI (both of which produce hyposthenuric
urine). This test must not be performed on azotaemic horses.
The object of the test is to establish whether or not the
horse can produce concentrated urine (psychogenic polydipsia
cases can; DI cases cannot).
Weigh horse accurately
(if possible).
Check BUN and creatinine are normal (if not don’t
proceed).
Take urine sample and measure SG (will usually be < 1.008
in cases requiring this test).
Remove water.
Check serum BUN and creatinine and urinary SG at least every
6 hours.
End of test is when
one of the following occurs:
- 24 hours water deprivation
- 5% reduction in bodyweight
- clinical signs of dehydration
- azotaemia develops
- urinary SG > 1.020
Interpretation:
- if SG rises above 1.020 this confirms renal concentrating
ability and therefore psychogenic polydipsia.
- if urine SG stays low and horse becomes dehydrated or
loses 5% bodyweight this suggests DI (often happens by 12
hours with DI), although could be psychogenic polydipsia
associated with ‘medullary washout’.
- if urine SG is still low after 24 hours but horse shows
no clinical signs of marked dehydration this implies psychogenic
polydipsia associated with ‘medullary washout’,
although could be DI.
b. Modified water deprivation test
Strictly speaking this test is used to differentiate DI
from psychogenic polydipsia. However, most DI cases will
become rapidly dehydrated within 12 hours of water deprivation
(see above) and this test is really used to confirm the
suspected diagnosis of psychogenic polydipsia with medullary
washout.
Start immediately following
standard water deprivation test above if:
- urine SG < 1.020 after 24 hours water deprivation
- < 5% reduction in bodyweight
- no azotaemia
- no clinical signs of dehydration.
Test involves allowing
restricted access to water for 2-3 days or until one of
the criteria above is reached. Allow water consumption equivalent
to 4% bodyweight per day (20 litres per 500kg) offered in
several aliquots through the day.
Measure serum BUN and creatinine and urinary SG at least
every 6 hours.
If urine SG rises above
1.020 this confirms psychogenc polydipsia. Continued inability
to concentrate urine confirms DI.
c. ADH response test
Used to differentiate central and renal DI. Central DI cases
successfully concentrate urine following ADH administration.
Renal DI cases shown no response to ADH administration.

© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
Interpretation
of blood sample results in geriatrics
The geriatric horse commonly suffers medical problems presenting
with non-specific clinical signs such as poor bodily condition
or a depressed mental attitude. The opportunity to investigate
and treat these cases has lead to many remarkable instances
of ‘coffin-dodging’, most notably as a result
of ‘high-tech’ dentistry, nutritional advice
and the diagnosis and treatment of endocrinopathies, hepatopathies
and enteropathies. Lack of significant abnormality on a
blood sample from a thin elderly horse gives the confidence
to approach the case as a dietary/dental condition rather
than a major internal medical problem.
Clinically healthy
geriatric horses and ponies actually show remarkably few
significant differences from their younger counterparts.
Analysis of blood results from ‘health checks’
on apparently normal horses and ponies at the LEH laboratory
suggests that geriatric horses tend to have slightly lower
red cell counts and albumen concentration and slightly higher
white cell counts and total globulins. However, there is
considerable individual variation making these generalisations
not very useful.
The commonest abnormalities
detected in blood samples taken from geriatric horses with
clinical problems are anaemia, hypoalbumenaemia, hyperglobulinaemia
and elevations in serum enzymes, most notably GGT and AP.
Anaemia in elderly horses is almost invariably mild and
poorly regenerative as a result of a chronic inflammatory
process and/or malnutrition. Anaemia is rarely the horse’s
primary problem and usually indicates an underlying cause.
Mild neutrophilia is often seen in cases of marked dental
disease and also in many cases of equine Cushing’s
disease and neoplasia (especially lymphoma). Lymphopaenia,
another typical finding in equine Cushing’s disease,
may also indicate a stress response in generally debilitated
and/or malnourished horses. Albumen concentration is a key
diagnostic factor in weight loss assessment in any age of
horse. Profound hypoalbumenaemia (<20 g/l) is almost
invariably indicative of protein-losing enteropathy (eg.
larval cyathostomosis or alimentary lymphoma) whereas mild
hypoalbumenaemia may also indicate hepatopathy or malnutrition.
Hyperglobulinaemia as well as indicating chronic infective
challenge is commonly seen in cases of hepatopathy and also
sometimes neoplasia. GGT remains the most sensitive indicator
of hepatopathy in common usage. Modest elevations of GGT
(eg 50-90iu/l) might simply indicate a degree of hepatic
lipidosis (secondary to Cushing’s disease) or age
related mild hepatopathy and are usually insignificant although
values greater than 100 iu/l should probably be taken more
seriously. AP although not a tissue-specific enzyme, is
raised in the majority of enteropathy and hepatopathy cases
and is the only enzymatic indicator of intestinal damage.
Clearly many other
laboratory parameters and tests may be useful in individual
cases and profiles are adaptable to individual situations.
Testing for equine Cushing’s disease remains a common
clinical dilemma with a multitude of potential choices of
test available, none of which are absolutely sensitive or
specific. However, the ‘overnight dexamethasone suppression
test’ appears to produce highly reliable results although
false positives and negatives are still occasionally found.
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
Diagnostic
sampling of airway secretions
There are 2 commonly
used methods of sampling airway secretions in horses: bronchoalveolar
lavage (BAL) and tracheal wash (TW) (also transtracheal
aspirate (TTA) less commonly used). Either can be submitted
for bacteriology and/or cytology but there are significant
pro’s and con’s of each:
Bacteriology
Sparse bacterial growth in TW fluid is not likely to be
relevant to the disease process. If quantitative bacteriology
is performed then >105 colony forming units per ml is
likely to be relevant although this probably adds little
extra information to ‘sparse, medium or heavy’
as a description of bacterial growth - medium being of possible
relevance and heavy being of probable relevance. The bacterial
species cultured is also an important consideration. The
most important agents associated with primary bacterial
airway are b-haemolytic streptococci (S. equi subsp. equi
and S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus), a-haemolyitc streptococci
(S. pneumoniae), Bordetella bronchiseptica, Actinobacillus
sp and Pasteurella sp. Other bacterial species are often
found but tend to be regarded as contaminants and secondary
invaders.
Cytology
TW generally has more neutrophils and less lymphocytes than
BAL. The normal cellular constituents of TW and BAL fluid
are shown below.
| |
TW
|
BAL
|
| |
|
|
| PMN (%) |
<50
|
<10
|
| LC (%) |
<10
|
<50
|
| Monos (%) |
40-80
|
40-80
|
| Eos (%) |
<2
|
<2
|
| Mast cells (%) |
<1
|
<5
|
Occasionally increased
numbers of eosinophils are seen for example in rare cases
of lungworm or eosinophilic interstitial pneumonitis. Some
young horses with ‘Inflammatory Airway Disease’
(IAD) may be found to have a high percentage of mast cells.
Rarely high lymphocyte percentages are seen possibly as
a result of respiratory viral disease?
By far the commonest
abnormal finding in cytological analysis of airway secretions
is neutrophilia. The wide normal range for TW neutrophils
makes this finding difficult to interpret and many normal
horses in dusty environments show marked TW neutrophilias
in the absence of disease. BAL is far more specific for
detecting genuine airway neutrophilia due to the smaller
reference range. BAL neutrophils accounting for > 10%
total cells confirms lung disease. In adult horses, airway
neutrophilia usually arises as a result of allergic lung
disease caused by ‘recurrent airway obstruction’
(RAO - the term now preferred for the conditions previously
known as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and
summer pasture associated obstructive pulmonary disease
(SPAOPD)). However, infectious lung disease (bacterial or
viral) will usually result in airway neutrophilia also.
These disease types cannot always be reliably differentiated
simply on BAL although generally the magnitude of the neutrophilia
is higher in RAO cases (eg typically 30-70% PMNs and up
to 90%+) than infectious diseases (eg. rarely >30% PMNs
although can be much higher in some cases) and also the
PMNs appear more ‘healthy’ and less degenerate
in allergic airway disease compared with infectious airway
disease. The results of TW culture, clinical signs and history
also add important differential diagnostic information.
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
Notes
on the interpretation of the leucogram in the adult horse
and pony
Interpretation of white
blood cell data can often be somewhat subjective and based
on opinion rather than hard and fast objective evidence.
Nevertheless there are certain clear rules that can be followed
to help in the initial interpretation and subjective views
can be superimposed in an attempt to refine the final interpretation.
The following discussion considers some of the aspects important
in reaching a final interpretation of a leucogram.
In the first instance
it is much more meaningful to consider individually the
absolute numbers of the different types of leucocytes rather
than their relative percentages. It is only when the total
individual leucocyte numbers are normal that the relative
differential cell counts might be helpful. For example,
the two cases below have the same differential percentages
but case 1 shows a neutropaenia only whereas case 2 shows
a lymphocytosis and eosinophilia only.
| |
case 1 |
case 2 |
| WBC |
6.7 x 109/l |
9.8 x 109/l |
| PMN |
2.5
x 109/l (38%) |
3.7 x 109/l (38%) |
| LC |
3.6 x 109/l (54%) |
5.3
x 109/l (54%) |
| Eos |
0.5 x 109/l (8%) |
0.8
x 109/l (8%) |
The three most common
leucogram abnormalities are neutrophilia, eosinophilia and
monocytosis. Neutrophilia (PMN > 6.5 x 109/l) is the
commonest of these. Neutrophilia is usually the result of
an acute or chronic inflammatory response. This may be caused
by infectious (viral, bacterial or parasitic) or non-infectious
(eg. azoturia, surgical trauma, immune-mediated disease,
neoplasia) disease. Another potential cause of neutrophilia
in the horse is stress associated with concurrent disease,
overtraining or poor management. The typical effect of endogenous
or exogenous corticosteroid on the leucogram is neutrophilia
associated with a lymphopaenia and eosinopaenia. Therefore
this type of leucocyte pattern in sick horses may be a non-specific
result of the primary condition rather than a specific indicator
of an inflammatory aetiology. Short term excitement perhaps
associated with venepuncture of a nervous horse or transport
immediately before sampling can also result in neutrophilia
but lymphocytosis may be more likely in these cases.
Eosinophilia (Eos >
0.8 x 109/l) is very rarely found in association with intestinal
parasitism in horses. Eosinophils undoubtedly play a role
in host defence against parasitic infections but are found
local to the parasite. Hence intra-arterial S.vulgaris larvae
(although very rare) may well be associated with a peripheral
eosinophilia, lungworm infection is usually associated with
an eosinophilia in tracheal washes or bronchoalveolar lavage
samples, encysted cyathostomes are associated with eosinophilic
infiltrates detectable in caecal, colonic and sometimes
rectal biopsies. Eosinophilia is unfortunately a fairly
non-specific finding as the eosinophil has many general
roles in host defence and eosinophilia is often seen as
a non-specific component of a systemic inflammatory reaction
(eg. viral infections). Eosinophils are attracted by mast
cell degranulation and have therefore been associated with
antigen-antibody interactions in tissues rich in mast cells
such as skin, respiratory tract and intestine and peripheral
eosinophilia is certainly seen fairly consistently in association
with hypersensitivity reactions such as sweet itch.
Monocytosis (Monos
> 0.5 x 109/l), similar to neutrophilia and eosinophilia,
is a non-specific inflammatory indicator seen to rise in
both acute and chronic inflammatory conditions and tissue
damage.
Is it possible to differentiate
bacterial and viral disease on the basis of haematology?
The most consistent
haematologic finding associated with the early stages of
viral infections (ie. the time when we are usually asked
to examine the horse and take a diagnostic blood sample)
is a neutrophilia (PMN > 6.5 x109/l). This has been demonstrated
in association with many types of viral infection in adult
horses and is indistinguishable from bacterial infections
on the basis of haematology. However, later in the course
of disease then mild neutropaenia and possibly lymphocytosis
and monocytosis would typify viral disease, whereas bacterial
infections more typically remain neutrophilic with, possibly,
a monocytosis, unless severe whereupon neutropaenia may
occur:
| |
early |
mid-late |
|
| VIRUS (typical): |
neutrophilia |
- neutropaenia/lymphocytosis/monocytosis |
- recovery |
| BACTERIAL (typical): |
neutrophilia |
- neutrophilia/monocytosis |
- recovery |
| BACTERIAL (severe): |
neutrophilia/neutropaenia |
- neutrophilia/neutropaenia |
- recovery (?) |
Is it possible to diagnose
parasitism on the basis of haematology or serum proteins?
Nematode infections
in the adult horse were once typified by intra-luminal adult
worms and larval migration associated with Strongylus vulgaris.
These were often associated with an eosinophilia detectable
in blood samples in response to intra-arterial larvae and
also, in some instances, a detectable increase in b1-globulins
(especially IgG(T)). Parasitological surveys in more recent
years have consistently confirmed the decline of S. vulgaris
(almost to the point of extinction in many instances) in
conjunction with a domination of parasitic burdens by members
of the cyathostome genus (small strongyles) which consistently
comprise almost 100% of nematode eggs detected in equine
faecal samples in this country. Cyathostome infection results
in encystment of larvae locally in the caecal and colonic
wall but is not associated with larval parasitic migration.
An eosinophilia is not associated with cyathostome infections
and a raised b1-globulin fraction is a very inconsistent
and non-specific finding.
Several research studies
have failed to confirm any clinically useful relationship
between serum protein electrophoresis and parasitism in
horses. Normal concentrations of IgG(T) and b1-globulins
are usually found in parasitised adult horses and ponies
although changes may be more likely in young horses. In
a recent investigation of horses with chronic diarrhoea,
55% of horses with parasitic diarrhoea did not have raised
b1-globulins and 37% of horses with raised b1-globulins
had no evidence of parasitism. Importantly, statistics would
imply that serum protein electrophoresis would be even less
predictive of parasitism in blood samples taken from non-diarrhoeic
horses. ‘Cyathostomosis’, the acute diarrhoea
and weight loss syndrome associated with en masse larval
emergence, is consistently associated with a neutrophilia,
hypoalbuminaemia and hyperfibrinogenaemia (all unfortunately
non-specific findings), but other than this blood samples
taken from parasitised horses show no consistent abnormalities
in haematology or protein analyses.
Prime considerations
in interpretation of the leucogram
These lists are not
intended to be exhaustive and comprehensive but rather to
serve as an aide memoire for the more common causes of abnormalities
of the leucogram seen in the adult horse.
| Neutrophilia (PMN
> 6.5 x 109/l) |
|
|
| - Inflammatory
disease |
- infectious |
- viral (early
phase response) |
| |
|
- acute/chronic
bacterial |
| |
|
- parasitic |
| |
- non-infectious |
- tissue damage
(eg. azoturia, surgery etc..) |
| |
|
- neoplasia (eg.
lymphosarcoma) |
| |
|
- immune-mediated
diseases |
| -
Endogenous/exogenous corticosteroid (stress, equine
Cushing’s disease) |
| -
Catecholamines (acute excitement/fear) |
Neutropaenia (PMN <
2.5 x 109/l)
- Excessive demand/sequestration
(eg. septicaemia, bacterial peritonitis, pleuritis)
- Endotoxaemia
- Viral infection (mid-late phase response)
Lymphocytosis (LC >
5.0 x 109/l)
- Infectious diseases
(primarily mid-late phase viral)
- Catecholamines (acute excitement/fear)
Lymphopaenia (LC <
1.5 x 109/l)
- Infectious diseases
(eg. early EHV)
- Endogenous/exogenous corticosteroid (stress, equine Cushing’s
disease)
Eosinophilia (Eos >
0.8 x 109/l)
- Hypersensitivity
diseases (eg. sweet itch, urticaria)
- Inflammatory diseases (see neutrophilia)
- Parasitic larval migration (rare)
Monocytosis (Monos
> 0.5 x 109/l)
- Inflammatory diseases
(see neutrophilia)
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
Testing
for Liver Disease in Horses
Tests
for liver disease can be subdivided according to the subpopulation
of liver cells we are trying to test: serum enzymes estimate
the population of damaged but still viable liver cells;
tests of liver function estimate the remaining population
of healthy and effective liver cells; and tests of liver
fibrosis test the functionally ineffective tissue which
has replaced dead liver cells (see figure).
1) Serum enzymes –
serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase (AP), aspartate
aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyltranferase (GGT),
glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), iditol dehydrogenase (IDH),
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are all known to increase in
response to various forms of liver disease. Generally speaking
these various enzymes are released from damaged, but still
viable, liver cells. A certain amount of information may
be gleaned from comparative elevations of the different
enzymes with GGT and AP being primarily derived from biliary
epithelial cells due to biliary disease or secondary biliary
hyperplasia whereas other enzymes are primarily derived
from hepatocytes per se. GLDH and IDH are very ‘time-sensitive’
with rapid rises and falls in association with active liver
disease. Other enzymes are less ‘time sensitive’
with persistently raised serum concentrations are often
seen for some time following resolution of a primary hepatic
insult – especially with GGT. Prognostic value has
been attributed to certain enzymes by some previous studies
including a recent large investigation performed at Liphook
in conjunction with the Animal Health Trust, The Royal Veterinary
College and Bristol University Veterinary School. However,
the association between raised liver enzymes and prognosis
is often weak except when marked elevations are seen. In
other words, in most cases enzymes are helpful in establishing
the presence of liver disease but not necessarily the severity.
2) Tests of liver function – simple serum tests including
albumin, various amino acids, ammonia, bile acids, bilirubin,
fibrinogen, globulins, glucose, and urea may give a reflection
of the remaining functional capacity of the liver and therefore
help quantify the remaining mass of healthy liver cells
(see figure) which is clearly more relevant to the degree
of liver failure. It is therefore not surprising that the
prognostic value of these tests is superior to that of serum
enzyme analysis. Further tests of liver function that are
also often performed include blood clotting times (PT and
APTT) and BSP half-life. In our experience the simple tests
that have proved most predictive of a poor prognosis in
cases of liver disease have been raised globulins (no additional
benefit from electrophoresis), raised bile acids, low albumin,
low urea and high fibrinogen (low fibrinogen has been reported
as useful in some previous publications!). Anecdotally prolonged
clotting times and BSP half-life also seem very helpful
but we have not generated adequate numbers for meaningful
statistical analysis.
3) Tests for liver
fibrosis – serum indicators of hepatic fibrosis have
not been reported in horses but are often used in human
hepatology. Fibrosis is a common pathologic feature detected
in biopsy samples from various equine hepatopathies and
has important prognostic relevance. Several tests can be
used including serum hyaluronate – a substance which
has been analysed in equine blood samples in experimental
studies of joint and respiratory disease and normal ranges
are established. This test is not currently commercially
available but may become of interest in the future.
Apart from blood testing,
other diagnostic techniques have also been proven to help
assess the prognosis of hepatopathy cases including severity
of clinical signs and ultrasonographic examination. However,
the single most helpful and important diagnostic and prognostic
test is liver biopsy which remains the ‘gold standard’
in both human and equine hepatopathies.
Ultrasound-guided liver
biopsy is a quick, simple, inexpensive and highly safe procedure
frequently performed on an outpatient basis (see Hospital
facilities). Only liver biopsy can help answer all 4 of
the central issues of most concern to the owner: How bad
is the liver disease?; What might have caused the liver
disease?; How should we treat it?; Is the horse likely to
recover? A liver biopsy scoring system developed by Liphook
Equine Hospital and the Animal Health Trust shows great
promise in more precisely quantifying the likely outcome
of liver disease cases subjected to liver biopsy –
details available for those who are interested.
© The Liphook
Equine Hospital 2005
|
|